Best Continuance Case Law and or Best Motion to Continue Case Law.
“denying the motion for continuance include the following: 1) whether the denial of the continuance creates an injustice for the movant; 2) whether the cause of the request for continuance was unforeseeable by the movant and not the result of dilatory practices; and 3) whether the opposing party would suffer any prejudice or inconvenience as a result of a continuance. Fleming v. Fleming, 710 So.2d 601, 603 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).” Diane KROCK, Appellant, v. Irwin ROZINSKY and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Appellees. No. 4D09–4815. Decided: January 11, 2012
2,307 thoughts on “Best Continuance Case Law / Motion to Continue Case Law”